沈阳市确保广大困难群众温暖过冬、温馨过节******
1月10日，沈阳市政府新闻办召开的发布会现场。 沈阳市委宣传部供图
中新网沈阳1月10日电 (李晛)沈阳市民政局副局长马丽梅10日在沈阳市政府新闻办召开的发布会上表示，在2023年两节期间，全市民政部门将紧紧围绕民政为民、民政爱民的工作宗旨，惠民生、解民忧、暖民心，切实解决好困难群众急难愁盼问题，确保广大困难群众温暖过冬、温馨过节。
在发放“两节”救助金上，沈阳市、区两级财政继续拨付专项经费，由各区、县(市)民政部门通过社会化发放方式，为全市低保家庭、低保边缘家庭、特困供养人员、孤儿和事实无人抚养儿童发放“两节”救助金，其中低保家庭每户600元、特困供养人员和孤儿每人600元，低保边缘家庭每户360元。全市共计为城乡困难群体发放“两节”救助金3360余万元，将在1月15日前陆续发放到位。
在发放各类救助物资上，今年为全市城乡低保家庭、低保边缘家庭、特困供养人员、孤儿和事实无人抚养儿童准备了5.6万份“暖心包”，包括了米、面、油、鸡蛋、牛奶、春联等8类物资；为城乡低保家庭、低保边缘家庭、特困供养人员、孤儿和事实无人抚养儿童、残疾人、60岁以上老年人、计划生育家庭特扶人员、农业农村局监测人口准备了210万份“健康防疫包”，包括了口罩、应急药品、消毒湿巾等6类物资。目前各区、县(市)正在有序组织发放，分期分批发放到位。
在精准强化临时救助上，各级民政部门加强对失业人员、灵活就业人员、低保边缘人口及防止返贫监测对象的走访摸排，全面落实由急难发生地直接实施临时救助的政策规定。春节期间，市民如因重病、火灾、交通事故等突发事件造成临时生活困难的，可以立即向当地街道、乡镇民政部门申请，各级民政部门均设有24小时值班人员为民众解困。
同时，春节期间，沈阳市民政局将指导各救助管理机构进一步扩大街面巡查范围，增加巡查频次，加大救助力度，劝导流浪乞讨人员回到家中或入站接受救助。对于确实不愿回家、不愿入站的流浪乞讨人员，及时为他们送去御寒衣物、被褥和食品，确保不发生冲击社会道德底线的事件；开展“情暖新春共护未来”困境儿童关爱服务活动，帮助儿童平安度假、健康过节；持续开展“守护夕阳，温情探访”专项行动，确保春节前对特殊老年人探访率达到100%。
此外，沈阳市开展“亲情解忧暖心”专项行动，全市民政干部走出办公室，走进困难家庭，现已累计走访慰问低保家庭33605户47466人，分散供养特困人员6324户6621人。走访中，民政部门投入救助慰问款物5.58万元，发放健康包30234份，帮助11501户解决困难问题11517个。据悉，民政部门还将开展慈善志愿帮扶专项行动，开展千名特殊人群帮扶活动等。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
| 佰家富app地图 |
